A GENERATIVE EXPLANATION OF POETIC PROSODY:
DIFFERENCE AND INTERFACE BETWEEN LINGUISTIC AND MUSICAL RHYTHM
A GENERATIVE EXPLANATION OF POETIC PROSODY:
DIFFERENCE AND INTERFACE BETWEEN LINGUISTIC AND MUSICAL RHYTHM
Yinan Wu
Abstract
Although both language and music are governed by the “Biological Principle of Rhythm” (Feng 2022), the roles of repetition and alternation in the two domains differ significantly. In language, repetition and alternation exist within abstract phonological structure, and the repetition of phonetic units serves only rhetorical purposes. In contrast, the repetition of musical units is obligatory to construct a perceivable and predictable periodicity. This paper introduces the concept of “tactus,” identifying it as the inner pulse in human rhythmic perception, which can serve as an interface between linguistic and musical rhythm. For music, sequences of tactus realize repetition, while alternation occurs between tactus and non-tactus positions. In poetry, grammatical prosodic units are mapped onto tactus positions to form the skeleton of poetic lines, whereas non-tactus positions accommodate non-branching prosodic constituents. Thus, the tactus-based framework defines the poetic meter generation as a process wherein well-formed prosodic units are mapped onto tactus positions within designated poetic templates.


